StandoutRun your own auditInternal demo - not a customer case study
Design audit
Flowly · sample SaaS page
An independent design quality check by Standout. Client-ready starts at 85.
Before
45
/100
After
86
/100
The score isn't the point. The point is whether the diagnosis is right and the page clearly improves. Compare the before and after below, then judge the read yourself.
The visual diff
Same page, rendered in a real browser, measured the same way both times.
On mobile
What was wrong, and the exact fix
Mobile layout broke
Why it matters · Most visitors land on a phone. Content ran edge to edge, the buttons stacked awkwardly, and text was undersized, so the page felt broken before anyone read a word.
Fix applied · Added 20px+ side gutters under 768px, cleanly stacked the hero buttons, raised mobile text sizing, and set 44px minimum tap targets so nothing touches the edge or is hard to press.
Text failed contrast and readability
Why it matters · Low-contrast, undersized body text fails WCAG and quietly loses anyone skimming or with weaker eyesight.
Fix applied · Switched to dark ink (#16181d) on white, raised body copy to 16px+, and brought every text and background pair past the 4.5:1 contrast ratio.
The next action was not clear
Why it matters · A vague "Get Started" with no obvious primary action leaves visitors unsure what to do, so they do nothing.
Fix applied · Made "Start free" the single primary CTA, added it to the nav, and rewrote the hero into a concrete value proposition so the next step is obvious.
The verdict
Standout flagged 3 specific problems, the fixes above were applied to the same page, and the re-scan moved it from 45 to 86 (+41), past the 85 client-ready bar. Same page, same scoring. The only thing that changed is the design.
Want this for your site?
Paste a URL, get your Standout Score, and the exact fixes to make it client-ready.
Run a free audit